<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blog marketing and the canonical domain issue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogopreneur.com/2007/05/09/blog-marketing-and-the-canonical-domain-issue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogopreneur.com/2007/05/09/blog-marketing-and-the-canonical-domain-issue/</link>
	<description>Blogging is an incredible way for companies to extend their reach on the Internet.  Learn how you can use blog marketing and SEO to build yourself into authority in you industry and reach out to new customers.  Be a Blogopreneur!</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Markie</title>
		<link>http://www.blogopreneur.com/2007/05/09/blog-marketing-and-the-canonical-domain-issue/#comment-32380</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Markie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 06:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogopreneur.com/2007/05/09/blog-marketing-and-the-canonical-domain-issue/#comment-32380</guid>
		<description>Yeah, when i forced it not to use www I found i was getting no spam because people couldn't comment as you need to use www.
I couldn't upload pictures I found a lot of problems when i was using it :s .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, when i forced it not to use www I found i was getting no spam because people couldn&#8217;t comment as you need to use <a href="http://www" rel="nofollow">http://www</a>.<br />
I couldn&#8217;t upload pictures I found a lot of problems when i was using it :s .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kian Ann</title>
		<link>http://www.blogopreneur.com/2007/05/09/blog-marketing-and-the-canonical-domain-issue/#comment-32151</link>
		<dc:creator>Kian Ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 01:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogopreneur.com/2007/05/09/blog-marketing-and-the-canonical-domain-issue/#comment-32151</guid>
		<description>Hey Harro,

Well, you could install multiple copies of anything and everything - but that will only mean that when you update, you will need to update all copies... and yes, duplicate content is a big no no when Google is concerned!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Harro,</p>
<p>Well, you could install multiple copies of anything and everything - but that will only mean that when you update, you will need to update all copies&#8230; and yes, duplicate content is a big no no when Google is concerned!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kian Ann</title>
		<link>http://www.blogopreneur.com/2007/05/09/blog-marketing-and-the-canonical-domain-issue/#comment-32149</link>
		<dc:creator>Kian Ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 00:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogopreneur.com/2007/05/09/blog-marketing-and-the-canonical-domain-issue/#comment-32149</guid>
		<description>Hey Mike - I didn't notice that!  So you mean for WordPress installations, you need to use the www version all the time?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mike - I didn&#8217;t notice that!  So you mean for WordPress installations, you need to use the www version all the time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harro!</title>
		<link>http://www.blogopreneur.com/2007/05/09/blog-marketing-and-the-canonical-domain-issue/#comment-30928</link>
		<dc:creator>Harro!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 15:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogopreneur.com/2007/05/09/blog-marketing-and-the-canonical-domain-issue/#comment-30928</guid>
		<description>Hi KA, I think that hosting and diskspace is so cheap now that creating multiple installations is not an issue vs. people trying to figure out rewrite rules.

Also having multiple domains pointing to the same content is going to be something that google doesn't appreciate right? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi KA, I think that hosting and diskspace is so cheap now that creating multiple installations is not an issue vs. people trying to figure out rewrite rules.</p>
<p>Also having multiple domains pointing to the same content is going to be something that google doesn&#8217;t appreciate right? <img src='http://www.blogopreneur.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Markie</title>
		<link>http://www.blogopreneur.com/2007/05/09/blog-marketing-and-the-canonical-domain-issue/#comment-30047</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Markie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 19:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogopreneur.com/2007/05/09/blog-marketing-and-the-canonical-domain-issue/#comment-30047</guid>
		<description>I thought I should update you on my situation at the moment I've noticed in my admin panel for wordpress that you need to use www . to upload pictures so when I was telling it not to use www it wouldn't upload my pictures so i recommend using www .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought I should update you on my situation at the moment I&#8217;ve noticed in my admin panel for wordpress that you need to use www . to upload pictures so when I was telling it not to use www it wouldn&#8217;t upload my pictures so i recommend using www .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shi Hengcheong</title>
		<link>http://www.blogopreneur.com/2007/05/09/blog-marketing-and-the-canonical-domain-issue/#comment-29538</link>
		<dc:creator>Shi Hengcheong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 01:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogopreneur.com/2007/05/09/blog-marketing-and-the-canonical-domain-issue/#comment-29538</guid>
		<description>Hi Kian Ann,
I did not test out the mod-rewrite script you stated above. The "third paragraph" will probably work fine if Wordpress were installed in the root directory. However, I was having problem with the re-direction for Wordpress installed in the sub-folder.

http: //shihengcheong.com/blog (without trailing slash) was redirect to http: //www.shihengcheong.com/blog/

I've solved this problem and the solution is post here:

&lt;a href='http://shihengcheong.com/blog/2007/02/fixing-canonical-urls-with-wordpress-url-rewrite/' rel="nofollow"&gt;Fixing Canonical URLs Problem with Wordpress URL Rewrite&lt;/a&gt;

You see, the right convention in Unix/Linux directory structure is to use a trailing slash for a folder. When there is no trailing slash, that should be a file.

When you selected the use of SEO friendly URL in Wordpress, the mod-rewrite changed the server default.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kian Ann,<br />
I did not test out the mod-rewrite script you stated above. The &#8220;third paragraph&#8221; will probably work fine if Wordpress were installed in the root directory. However, I was having problem with the re-direction for Wordpress installed in the sub-folder.</p>
<p>http: //shihengcheong.com/blog (without trailing slash) was redirect to http: //www.shihengcheong.com/blog/</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve solved this problem and the solution is post here:</p>
<p><a href='http://shihengcheong.com/blog/2007/02/fixing-canonical-urls-with-wordpress-url-rewrite/' rel="nofollow">Fixing Canonical URLs Problem with Wordpress URL Rewrite</a></p>
<p>You see, the right convention in Unix/Linux directory structure is to use a trailing slash for a folder. When there is no trailing slash, that should be a file.</p>
<p>When you selected the use of SEO friendly URL in Wordpress, the mod-rewrite changed the server default.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kian Ann</title>
		<link>http://www.blogopreneur.com/2007/05/09/blog-marketing-and-the-canonical-domain-issue/#comment-28602</link>
		<dc:creator>Kian Ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 23:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogopreneur.com/2007/05/09/blog-marketing-and-the-canonical-domain-issue/#comment-28602</guid>
		<description>hey Mike!  Yeah!  WordPress plugins are wondrous aren't they! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey Mike!  Yeah!  WordPress plugins are wondrous aren&#8217;t they! <img src='http://www.blogopreneur.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Markie</title>
		<link>http://www.blogopreneur.com/2007/05/09/blog-marketing-and-the-canonical-domain-issue/#comment-28365</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Markie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 17:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogopreneur.com/2007/05/09/blog-marketing-and-the-canonical-domain-issue/#comment-28365</guid>
		<description>If you want to cheat and install a plugin you can use &lt;a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/no-www/" rel="nofollow"&gt;No WWW&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to cheat and install a plugin you can use <a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/no-www/" rel="nofollow">No WWW</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
