Comments on: How Valuable is Original and Quality Content?

By: Kian Ann

Kian Ann — Sun, 22 Oct 2006 18:42:58 +0000

That’s wonderful! The blogosphere needs good original content!

By: Satish

Satish — Sat, 21 Oct 2006 04:28:47 +0000

Me,too,sticking to original contents. Either I flourish or I perish!

By: Kian Ann

Kian Ann — Fri, 20 Oct 2006 15:07:55 +0000

Thanks Satish and Jonathan for your thoughts. I guess what irks original content publishers like us are that these stolen content sites can make a quick buck.

I’m definitely sticking to original content!

By: Jonathan Bailey

Jonathan Bailey — Fri, 20 Oct 2006 15:04:30 +0000

Original content does mean a great deal. Unoriginal content might fool a search engine, but it won’t rarely fool visitors. Visitors value original content that is regularly updated. That’s how you build an established readership and grow as an author.

Stolen content might fool the search engines, but it won’t keep visitors coming back. The only way to build a viable long-term online presence with original content.

The problem isn’t that duplicate content helps people build quick empires, but that it puts a drag on the legitimate creators. It works like an anchor weighing down content creators, search engines and end users.

Just my experience.

By: Satish

Satish — Fri, 20 Oct 2006 11:16:35 +0000

I had read your comments only at Blog-Republic but after going through your post I am reassured that there are others who think and write to make a point or two in their blogs. I was aghast to read a claim made by a blogger churning out posts by dozens a week and enjoying high hits that he could one day become Charles Dickens! Your calling spade a spade and similarly by others should do some cleansing in blogosphere.